[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YA/jlOuNpcPPNHA1@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 10:40:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 11/26] x86/mm: Update ptep_set_wrprotect() and
pmdp_set_wrprotect() for transition from _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_COW
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 09:46:36AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 07:27:09PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> > > + pte_t old_pte, new_pte;
> > > +
> > > + do {
> > > + old_pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
> > > + new_pte = pte_wrprotect(old_pte);
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing something but those two can happen outside of the
> > loop, no? Or is *ptep somehow changing concurrently while the loop is
> > doing the CMPXCHG and you need to recreate it each time?
> >
> > IOW, you can generate upfront and do the empty loop...
> >
> > > +
> > > + } while (!try_cmpxchg(&ptep->pte, &old_pte.pte, new_pte.pte));
> > > +
> > > + return;
> > > + }
>
> Empty loop would be wrong, but that wants to be written like:
>
> old_pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
> do {
> new_pte = pte_wrprotect(old_pte);
> } while (try_cmpxchg(&ptep->pte, &old_pte.pte, new_pte.pte));
! went missing, too early, moar wake-up juice.
> Since try_cmpxchg() will update old_pte on failure.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists