[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f69ab09-57e8-6da0-07ab-5b885758fc27@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 08:43:51 -0800
From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 11/26] x86/mm: Update ptep_set_wrprotect() and
pmdp_set_wrprotect() for transition from _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_COW
On 1/26/2021 1:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 09:46:36AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 07:27:09PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>
>>>> + pte_t old_pte, new_pte;
>>>> +
>>>> + do {
>>>> + old_pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
>>>> + new_pte = pte_wrprotect(old_pte);
>>>
>>> Maybe I'm missing something but those two can happen outside of the
>>> loop, no? Or is *ptep somehow changing concurrently while the loop is
>>> doing the CMPXCHG and you need to recreate it each time?
>>>
>>> IOW, you can generate upfront and do the empty loop...
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + } while (!try_cmpxchg(&ptep->pte, &old_pte.pte, new_pte.pte));
>>>> +
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>
>> Empty loop would be wrong, but that wants to be written like:
>>
>> old_pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
>> do {
>> new_pte = pte_wrprotect(old_pte);
>> } while (try_cmpxchg(&ptep->pte, &old_pte.pte, new_pte.pte));
>
> ! went missing, too early, moar wake-up juice.
>
>> Since try_cmpxchg() will update old_pte on failure.
Thanks Peter! I will fix that.
--
Yu-cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists