lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:31:17 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>,
        Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] gpiolib: Bind gpio_device to a driver to enable
 fw_devlink=on by default

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 3:22 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:35:59AM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > There are multiple instances of GPIO device tree nodes of the form:
> >
> > foo {
> >       compatible = "acme,foo";
> >       ...
> >
> >       gpio0: gpio0@...xxxxx {
> >               compatible = "acme,bar";
> >               ...
> >               gpio-controller;
> >       };
> >
> >       gpio1: gpio1@...xxxxx {
> >               compatible = "acme,bar";
> >               ...
> >               gpio-controller;
> >       };
> >
> >       ...
> > }
> >
> > bazz {
> >       my-gpios = <&gpio0 ...>;
> > }
> >
> > Case 1: The driver for "foo" populates struct device for these gpio*
> > nodes and then probes them using a driver that binds with "acme,bar".
> > This driver for "acme,bar" then registers the gpio* nodes with gpiolib.
> > This lines up with how DT nodes with the "compatible" property are
> > typically converted to struct devices and then registered with driver
> > core to probe them. This also allows the gpio* devices to hook into all
> > the driver core capabilities like runtime PM, probe deferral,
> > suspend/resume ordering, device links, etc.
> >
> > Case 2: The driver for "foo" doesn't populate struct devices for these
> > gpio* nodes before registering them with gpiolib. Instead it just loops
> > through its child nodes and directly registers the gpio* nodes with
> > gpiolib.
> >
> > Drivers that follow case 2 cause problems with fw_devlink=on. This is
> > because fw_devlink will prevent bazz from probing until there's a struct
> > device that has gpio0 as its fwnode (because bazz lists gpio0 as a GPIO
> > supplier). Once the struct device is available, fw_devlink will create a
> > device link with gpio0 device as the supplier and bazz device as the
> > consumer. After this point, since the gpio0 device will never bind to a
> > driver, the device link will prevent bazz device from ever probing.
> >
> > Finding and refactoring all the instances of drivers that follow case 2
> > will cause a lot of code churn and it is not something that can be done
> > in one shot. In some instances it might not even be possible to refactor
> > them cleanly. Examples of such instances are [1] [2].
> >
> > This patch works around this problem and avoids all the code churn by
> > simply setting the fwnode of the gpio_device and creating a stub driver
> > to bind to the gpio_device. This allows all the consumers to continue
> > probing when the driver follows case 2.
> >
> > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201014191235.7f71fcb4@xhacker.debian/
> > [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e28e1f38d87c12a3c714a6573beba6e1@kernel.org/
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
> > Cc: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> > Fixes: e590474768f1 ("driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default")
>
> As this commit is in my driver-core git tree, can I just take this in
> the same tree?  Can I get an ack from the maintainer for this?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Go ahead.

Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ