[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YBGA/tK+yyX3i1xx@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:04:30 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] gpiolib: Bind gpio_device to a driver to enable
fw_devlink=on by default
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 03:31:17PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 3:22 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 11:35:59AM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > There are multiple instances of GPIO device tree nodes of the form:
> > >
> > > foo {
> > > compatible = "acme,foo";
> > > ...
> > >
> > > gpio0: gpio0@...xxxxx {
> > > compatible = "acme,bar";
> > > ...
> > > gpio-controller;
> > > };
> > >
> > > gpio1: gpio1@...xxxxx {
> > > compatible = "acme,bar";
> > > ...
> > > gpio-controller;
> > > };
> > >
> > > ...
> > > }
> > >
> > > bazz {
> > > my-gpios = <&gpio0 ...>;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Case 1: The driver for "foo" populates struct device for these gpio*
> > > nodes and then probes them using a driver that binds with "acme,bar".
> > > This driver for "acme,bar" then registers the gpio* nodes with gpiolib.
> > > This lines up with how DT nodes with the "compatible" property are
> > > typically converted to struct devices and then registered with driver
> > > core to probe them. This also allows the gpio* devices to hook into all
> > > the driver core capabilities like runtime PM, probe deferral,
> > > suspend/resume ordering, device links, etc.
> > >
> > > Case 2: The driver for "foo" doesn't populate struct devices for these
> > > gpio* nodes before registering them with gpiolib. Instead it just loops
> > > through its child nodes and directly registers the gpio* nodes with
> > > gpiolib.
> > >
> > > Drivers that follow case 2 cause problems with fw_devlink=on. This is
> > > because fw_devlink will prevent bazz from probing until there's a struct
> > > device that has gpio0 as its fwnode (because bazz lists gpio0 as a GPIO
> > > supplier). Once the struct device is available, fw_devlink will create a
> > > device link with gpio0 device as the supplier and bazz device as the
> > > consumer. After this point, since the gpio0 device will never bind to a
> > > driver, the device link will prevent bazz device from ever probing.
> > >
> > > Finding and refactoring all the instances of drivers that follow case 2
> > > will cause a lot of code churn and it is not something that can be done
> > > in one shot. In some instances it might not even be possible to refactor
> > > them cleanly. Examples of such instances are [1] [2].
> > >
> > > This patch works around this problem and avoids all the code churn by
> > > simply setting the fwnode of the gpio_device and creating a stub driver
> > > to bind to the gpio_device. This allows all the consumers to continue
> > > probing when the driver follows case 2.
> > >
> > > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201014191235.7f71fcb4@xhacker.debian/
> > > [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e28e1f38d87c12a3c714a6573beba6e1@kernel.org/
> > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
> > > Cc: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> > > Fixes: e590474768f1 ("driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default")
> >
> > As this commit is in my driver-core git tree, can I just take this in
> > the same tree? Can I get an ack from the maintainer for this?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Go ahead.
>
> Acked-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Thanks, now queued up.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists