[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YBHqeXPMILg+352D@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 23:34:33 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexander A Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
Cc: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] MIPS: Octeon: qspinlock: Flush write buffer
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 09:36:24PM +0100, Alexander A Sverdlin wrote:
> From: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
>
> Flushing the write buffer brings aroung 10% performace on the tight
> uncontended spinlock loops on Octeon. Refer to commit 500c2e1fdbcc
> ("MIPS: Optimize spinlocks.").
No objection to the patch, but I don't find the above referenced commit
to be enlightening wrt nudge_writes(). The best it has to offer is the
comment that's already in the code.
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 8a88eb2..0a707f3 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ static inline void queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
> /* This could be optimised with ARCH_HAS_MMIOWB */
> mmiowb();
> smp_store_release(&lock->locked, 0);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON
> + nudge_writes();
> +#endif
> }
>
> #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> --
> 2.10.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists