[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210127022507.23674-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:25:07 -0800
From: menglong8.dong@...il.com
To: ast@...nel.org
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, jackmanb@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: change 'BPF_ADD' to 'BPF_AND' in print_bpf_insn()
From: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>
This 'BPF_ADD' is duplicated, and I belive it should be 'BPF_AND'.
Fixes: 981f94c3e921 ("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>
---
kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
index 19ff8fed7f4b..3acc7e0b6916 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
insn->dst_reg,
insn->off, insn->src_reg);
else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
- (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_ADD ||
+ (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_AND ||
insn->imm == BPF_OR || insn->imm == BPF_XOR)) {
verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) %s r%d\n",
insn->code,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists