linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: change 'BPF_ADD' to 'BPF_AND' in print_bpf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Jan 2021 12:53:50 +0100
From:   Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To:     menglong8.dong@...il.com
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, kafai@...com,
        songliubraving@...com, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: change 'BPF_ADD' to 'BPF_AND' in print_bpf_insn()

Thanks!

On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 03:25, <menglong8.dong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>
>
> This 'BPF_ADD' is duplicated, and I belive it should be 'BPF_AND'.
>
> Fixes: 981f94c3e921 ("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>

Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>

> ---
>  kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
> index 19ff8fed7f4b..3acc7e0b6916 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
>                                 insn->dst_reg,
>                                 insn->off, insn->src_reg);
>                 else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
> -                        (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_ADD ||
> +                        (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_AND ||
>                           insn->imm == BPF_OR || insn->imm == BPF_XOR)) {
>                         verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) %s r%d\n",
>                                 insn->code,
> --
> 2.25.1
>