linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <769ea3fe77eab9b37d863251e97bcb29@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2021 03:18:46 +0530
From:   mdalam@...eaurora.org
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
        boris.brezillon@...labora.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sricharan@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register

On 2021-01-14 21:23, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@...eaurora.org> wrote on Sun, 10 Jan 2021
> 09:31:45 +0530:
> 
>> From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to
> 
>                                 a
> 
>> read last codeword. This change will update the same.
> 
>        the?           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>                       Please reword this sentence.

   Fixed this in V4 patch.
> 
>> For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be
>> use.For last code word READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be
>> use.
> 
> "For the first three codewords, READ_LOCATION_n registers will be used.
> The last codeword register will be accessed through
> READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n."
> 
> Also, please specify what these registers store.

   The location register is mainly use for reading controller
   buffer via BAM mode. The bits of the register 
"NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n, n=0..4"
   as follow:
   [9:0]-bits : (OFFSET) This bit defines the offset from the buffer base 
address to be picked up for DMA.
   [25:16]-bits: (SIZE) This bit of every register will define the size 
of the chunk for DMA.
   31-bit :      (LAST) If this bit is set, the controller takes the 
particular register to specify the last chunk
                       of data made available for DMA. This chunk is part 
of the internal buffer of the controller.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@...eaurora.org>
> 
> Could someone please test this patch?

   I have tested this patch on IPQ5018 platform and its working fine.
> 
>> ---
>> [V3]
>>  * Added else condition for last code word in update_rw_regs().
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 84 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c 
>> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> index 667e4bf..50ff6e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
>>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_1		0xf24
>>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_2		0xf28
>>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_3		0xf2c
>> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0	0xf40
>> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1	0xf44
>> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2	0xf48
>> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3	0xf4c
>> 
>>  /* dummy register offsets, used by write_reg_dma */
>>  #define	NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE		0xdead
>> @@ -187,6 +191,12 @@ nandc_set_reg(nandc, 
>> NAND_READ_LOCATION_##reg,			\
>>  	      ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) |			\
>>  	      ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>> 
>> +#define nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last)	\
>> +nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_##reg,			\
>> +	      ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) |		\
>> +	      ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) |			\
>> +	      ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * Returns the actual register address for all NAND_DEV_ registers
>>   * (i.e. NAND_DEV_CMD0, NAND_DEV_CMD1, NAND_DEV_CMD2 and 
>> NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD)
>> @@ -316,6 +326,10 @@ struct nandc_regs {
>>  	__le32 read_location1;
>>  	__le32 read_location2;
>>  	__le32 read_location3;
>> +	__le32 read_location_last0;
>> +	__le32 read_location_last1;
>> +	__le32 read_location_last2;
>> +	__le32 read_location_last3;
>> 
>>  	__le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_clr;
>>  	__le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_set;
>> @@ -644,6 +658,14 @@ static __le32 *offset_to_nandc_reg(struct 
>> nandc_regs *regs, int offset)
>>  		return &regs->read_location2;
>>  	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_3:
>>  		return &regs->read_location3;
>> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0:
>> +		return &regs->read_location_last0;
>> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1:
>> +		return &regs->read_location_last1;
>> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2:
>> +		return &regs->read_location_last2;
>> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3:
>> +		return &regs->read_location_last3;
>>  	default:
>>  		return NULL;
>>  	}
>> @@ -719,9 +741,14 @@ static void update_rw_regs(struct qcom_nand_host 
>> *host, int num_cw, bool read)
>>  	nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_STATUS, host->clrreadstatus);
>>  	nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
>> 
>> -	if (read)
>> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
>> -				   host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
>> +	if (read) {
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
>> +					host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
>> +		else
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
>> +					host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
>> +	}
>>  }
>> 
>>  /*
>> @@ -1096,9 +1123,13 @@ static void config_nand_page_read(struct 
>> qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>>  static void
>>  config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
>>  {
>> -	if (nandc->props->is_bam)
>> +	if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
>> +			write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0,
>> +				      1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>>  		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
>>  			      NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>> +	}
>> 
>>  	write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>>  	write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>> @@ -1633,16 +1664,28 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, 
>> struct nand_chip *chip,
>>  	}
>> 
>>  	if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
>> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
>> +		else
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> 
> You repeat many times this logic, a helper to avoid this extra
> indentation level with the if/else block is needed.

   Fixed this V4 patch.
> 
>>  		read_loc += data_size1;
>> 
>> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
>> +		else
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
>>  		read_loc += oob_size1;
>> 
>> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
>> +		else
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
>>  		read_loc += data_size2;
>> 
>> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 0);
>> +		else
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
>>  	}
> 
> Thanks,
> Miquèl