[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210128165447.3da0d98e@lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:54:47 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...ts.elisa.tech,
Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@...-regensburg.de>,
Wolfgang Mauerer <wolfgang.mauerer@...-regensburg.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pia Eichinger <pia.eichinger@...oth-regensburg.de>,
Başak Erdamar <basakerdamar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Small student project idea on appropriate integration trees in
MAINTAINERS
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:22:24 +0100
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com> wrote:
> In this project, we can make use of:
>
> - gitdm [git://git.lwn.net/gitdm.git]: gitdm includes some scripts to
> parse MAINTAINERS and obtain the integration tree patch of a commit.
Look also at the 'treeplot' tool there, which determines which tree(s)
each patch went through and makes pretty (OK, not hugely pretty) pictures
from the result.
I suspect you'll find that the tree information is mostly correct.
Developers need to know that to be able to base their patches properly; an
incorrect entry would lead to a certain amount of maintainer misery.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists