lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210128032205.GV308988@casper.infradead.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:22:05 +0000
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     bingjingc <bingjingc@...ology.com>
Cc:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.com, jack@...e.cz,
        axboe@...nel.dk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cccheng@...ology.com,
        robbieko@...ology.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] handle large user and group ID for isofs and udf

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:17:00AM +0800, bingjingc wrote:
> From: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@...ology.com>
> 
> The uid/gid (unsigned int) of a domain user may be larger than INT_MAX.
> The parse_options of isofs and udf will return 0, and mount will fail
> with -EINVAL. These patches try to handle large user and group ID.
> 
> BingJing Chang (3):
>   isofs: handle large user and group ID
>   udf: handle large user and group ID
>   parser: add unsigned int parser

This is the wrong way to submit this patch series.

Patch 1: add unsigned int parser
Patch 2: Use it in isofs
Patch 3: Use it in udf

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ