[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210128032205.GV308988@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:22:05 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: bingjingc <bingjingc@...ology.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.com, jack@...e.cz,
axboe@...nel.dk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cccheng@...ology.com,
robbieko@...ology.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] handle large user and group ID for isofs and udf
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:17:00AM +0800, bingjingc wrote:
> From: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@...ology.com>
>
> The uid/gid (unsigned int) of a domain user may be larger than INT_MAX.
> The parse_options of isofs and udf will return 0, and mount will fail
> with -EINVAL. These patches try to handle large user and group ID.
>
> BingJing Chang (3):
> isofs: handle large user and group ID
> udf: handle large user and group ID
> parser: add unsigned int parser
This is the wrong way to submit this patch series.
Patch 1: add unsigned int parser
Patch 2: Use it in isofs
Patch 3: Use it in udf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists