[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eei5hhg0.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 14:24:31 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>, corbet@....net,
vegard.nossum@...cle.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
rdunlap@...radead.org, grandmaster@...klimov.de
Cc: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] docs: path-lookup: update path_to_nameidata() parth
On Tue, Jan 26 2021, Fox Chen wrote:
> No path_to_namei() anymore, step_into() will be called.
> Related commit: c99687a03a78775f77d57fe9b07af4c8ec3dd03c
>
> Signed-off-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@...il.com>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst
> index e778db767120..2ad96e1e3c49 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/path-lookup.rst
> @@ -455,7 +455,7 @@ In the absence of symbolic links, ``walk_component()`` creates a new
> ``struct path`` containing a counted reference to the new dentry and a
> reference to the new ``vfsmount`` which is only counted if it is
> different from the previous ``vfsmount``. It then calls
> -``path_to_nameidata()`` to install the new ``struct path`` in the
> +``step_into()`` to install the new ``struct path`` in the
> ``struct nameidata`` and drop the unneeded references.
The logic describe here is now embodied by the code in step_into(), so
the change doesn't make the description any more correct.
Possibly you need to change the hero of the story from walk_component()
to step_into(), but that is just a guess.
NeilBrown
>
> This "hand-over-hand" sequencing of getting a reference to the new
> --
> 2.30.0
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (854 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists