[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YBLou2KO4DQ6rjtf@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:39:23 -0500
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Abaci Team <abaci-bugfix@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernfs: Remove redundant code
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 04:25:32PM +0800, Abaci Team wrote:
> Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
>
> ./fs/kernfs/file.c:647:1-3: WARNING: possible condition with no effect
> (if == else).
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Suggested-by: Jiapeng Zhong <oswb@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Abaci Team <abaci-bugfix@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/kernfs/file.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c
> index c757193..9a74c9d 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c
> @@ -644,11 +644,7 @@ static int kernfs_fop_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> * Both paths of the branch look the same. They're supposed to
> * look that way and give @of->mutex different static lockdep keys.
Please read the comment right above.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists