[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0940484c3c64c3a6ba1e05f19f2d5137bc4fdcdf.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:25:28 +0800
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To: Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ACPI: tables: Mark acpi_init_fpdt with static
keyword
Hi, Wei,
Thanks for the patch.
Given that there are a couple of things need to be fixed in the orignal
patch, I'd prefer to refresh the patch with all the fixes included
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/20210129061548.13448-1-rui.zhang@intel.com/
what do you think?
thanks,
rui
On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 19:31 +0800, Zou Wei wrote:
> Fix the following sparse warning:
>
> drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c:230:6: warning: symbol 'acpi_init_fpdt' was
> not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> index b810811..968f9cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int fpdt_process_subtable(u64 address, u32
> subtable_type)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -void acpi_init_fpdt(void)
> +static void acpi_init_fpdt(void)
> {
> acpi_status status;
> struct acpi_table_header *header;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists