[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1aadcf4006fd4f94822646fd800deb62@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 02:23:31 +0000
From: "Zouwei (Samuel)" <zou_wei@...wei.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH -next] ACPI: tables: Mark acpi_init_fpdt with static keyword
Hi Rui,
You can fix it in your patch together.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Zhang Rui [mailto:rui.zhang@...el.com]
发送时间: 2021年1月29日 14:25
收件人: Zouwei (Samuel) <zou_wei@...wei.com>; rjw@...ysocki.net; lenb@...nel.org
抄送: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
主题: Re: [PATCH -next] ACPI: tables: Mark acpi_init_fpdt with static keyword
Hi, Wei,
Thanks for the patch.
Given that there are a couple of things need to be fixed in the orignal patch, I'd prefer to refresh the patch with all the fixes included
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/20210129061548.13448-1-rui.zhang@intel.com/
what do you think?
thanks,
rui
On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 19:31 +0800, Zou Wei wrote:
> Fix the following sparse warning:
>
> drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c:230:6: warning: symbol 'acpi_init_fpdt' was
> not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c index
> b810811..968f9cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_fpdt.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int fpdt_process_subtable(u64 address, u32
> subtable_type)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -void acpi_init_fpdt(void)
> +static void acpi_init_fpdt(void)
> {
> acpi_status status;
> struct acpi_table_header *header;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists