[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdN80xTCxH19OLq1D3PqgfbV+TEs=aTHP62ScsG+aZ72g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:42:51 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Eric Tremblay <etremblay@...tech-controls.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
"Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey.kornilov@...il.com>,
Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] serial: 8250: remove UART_CAP_TEMT on PORT_16550A_FSL64
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 8:07 PM Eric Tremblay
<etremblay@...tech-controls.com> wrote:
> On 2021-01-29 6:25 a.m., Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> Considering the use of the reversed capability UART_CAP_NOTEMT should I set
> the flag directly in uart_config like:
>
> [PORT_16550A_FSL64] = {
> .name = "16550A_FSL64",
> .fifo_size = 64,
> .tx_loadsz = 63,
> .fcr = UART_FCR_ENABLE_FIFO | UART_FCR_R_TRIG_10 |
> UART_FCR7_64BYTE,
> .flags = UART_CAP_FIFO | UART_CAP_NOTEMT,
> },
This looks much better!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists