linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] bits_per_long.h: introduce SMALL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f9dba4c16fb49e0ce19a8152dd1416f8d4056680.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2021 13:24:09 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-SH <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
        "Ma, Jianpeng" <jianpeng.ma@...el.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] bits_per_long.h: introduce SMALL_CONST() macro

On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 23:10 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:49 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
[]
> > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> >  #define GENMASK(h, l) \
> >         (GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) + __GENMASK(h, l))
> > 
> > -#define BITS_FIRST(nr)         GENMASK(nr), 0)
> > +#define BITS_FIRST(nr)         GENMASK((nr), 0)
> 
> How come?!

It's broken otherwise with unbalanced parentheses...