linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] soundwire: intel: add SDW_MASTER_QUIRKS_CLEAR_INITIAL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:20:08 -0600
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com,
        hui.wang@...onical.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        jank@...ence.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
        rander.wang@...ux.intel.com, bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] soundwire: intel: add
 SDW_MASTER_QUIRKS_CLEAR_INITIAL_CLASH quirk



On 2/1/21 4:42 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 26-01-21, 16:37, Bard Liao wrote:
>> There is nothing we can do to handle the bus clash interrupt before
>> interrupt mask is enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soundwire/intel.c | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
>> index a2d5cdaa9998..f7ba1a77a1df 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
>> @@ -1286,6 +1286,8 @@ static int sdw_master_read_intel_prop(struct sdw_bus *bus)
>>   	if (quirk_mask & SDW_INTEL_QUIRK_MASK_BUS_DISABLE)
>>   		prop->hw_disabled = true;
>>   
>> +	prop->quirks = SDW_MASTER_QUIRKS_CLEAR_INITIAL_CLASH;
> 
> Should this not be last 'enabling' the quirk patch in series :)

Sorry, I don't understand the comment. Do you mind clarifying Vinod?