[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210201110921.GZ2771@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:39:21 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jank@...ence.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, rander.wang@...ux.intel.com,
ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com, hui.wang@...onical.com,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] soundwire: bus: clear parity interrupt before the
mask is enabled
On 26-01-21, 16:37, Bard Liao wrote:
> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
>
> We recently added the ability to discard bus clash interrupts reported
> on startup. These bus clash interrupts can happen randomly on some
> platforms and don't seem to be valid. A master-level quirk helped
> squelch those spurious errors.
>
> Additional tests on a new platform with the Maxim 98373 amplifier
> showed a rare case where the parity interrupt is also thrown on
> startup, at the same time as bus clashes. This issue only seems to
> happen infrequently and was only observed during suspend-resume stress
> tests while audio is streaming. We could make the problem go away by
> adding a Slave-level quirk, but there is no evidence that the issue is
> actually a Slave problem: the parity is provided by the Master, which
> could also set an invalid parity in corner cases.
>
> This patch suggests an additional bus-level quirk for parity, which is
> only applied when the codec device is not known to have an issue with
> parity. The initial parity error will be ignored, but a trace will be
> logged to help identify potential root causes (likely a combination of
> issues on both master and slave sides influenced by board-specific
> electrical parameters).
>
> BugLink: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/2533
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/soundwire/intel.c | 3 ++-
> include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> index d394905936e4..57581fdb2ea9 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
> @@ -1256,6 +1256,15 @@ static int sdw_initialize_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave)
> sdw_write_no_pm(slave, SDW_SCP_INT1, SDW_SCP_INT1_BUS_CLASH);
> }
> }
> + if ((slave->bus->prop.quirks & SDW_MASTER_QUIRKS_CLEAR_INITIAL_PARITY) &&
> + !(slave->prop.quirks & SDW_SLAVE_QUIRKS_INVALID_INITIAL_PARITY)) {
> + /* Clear parity interrupt before enabling interrupt mask */
> + status = sdw_read_no_pm(slave, SDW_SCP_INT1);
> + if (status & SDW_SCP_INT1_PARITY) {
> + dev_warn(&slave->dev, "PARITY error detected before INT mask is enabled\n");
> + sdw_write_no_pm(slave, SDW_SCP_INT1, SDW_SCP_INT1_PARITY);
> + }
> + }
>
> /*
> * Set SCP_INT1_MASK register, typically bus clash and
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> index f7ba1a77a1df..c1fdc85d0a74 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> @@ -1286,7 +1286,8 @@ static int sdw_master_read_intel_prop(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> if (quirk_mask & SDW_INTEL_QUIRK_MASK_BUS_DISABLE)
> prop->hw_disabled = true;
>
> - prop->quirks = SDW_MASTER_QUIRKS_CLEAR_INITIAL_CLASH;
> + prop->quirks = SDW_MASTER_QUIRKS_CLEAR_INITIAL_CLASH |
> + SDW_MASTER_QUIRKS_CLEAR_INITIAL_PARITY;
move this to intel patch please..
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> index a2766c3b603d..30415354d419 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
> @@ -426,6 +426,7 @@ struct sdw_master_prop {
> };
>
> #define SDW_MASTER_QUIRKS_CLEAR_INITIAL_CLASH BIT(0)
> +#define SDW_MASTER_QUIRKS_CLEAR_INITIAL_PARITY BIT(1)
Why not add this quirk in patch 1..?
Also add comments about each quirk, hopefully it wont be a big table
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists