| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0a20dc79-a462-f3fb-14af-db151b688e5a@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 11:23:11 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: "Viswas.G@...rochip.com" <Viswas.G@...rochip.com>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"akshatzen@...gle.com" <akshatzen@...gle.com>,
"Ruksar.devadi@...rochip.com" <Ruksar.devadi@...rochip.com>,
"radha@...gle.com" <radha@...gle.com>,
"bjashnani@...gle.com" <bjashnani@...gle.com>,
"vishakhavc@...gle.com" <vishakhavc@...gle.com>,
"jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com" <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
"Ashokkumar.N@...rochip.com" <Ashokkumar.N@...rochip.com>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>,
"kashyap.desai@...adcom.com" <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
"ming.lei@...hat.com" <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx hw
On 31/01/2021 07:19, Viswas.G@...rochip.com wrote:
> Thanks Johns.
>
> We could see a kernel crash while testing this patch.
Thanks for testing.
>
> [ 246.724632] scsi host10: pm80xx
> [ 248.005258] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0
> [ 248.168973] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000110
> [ 248.175926] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [ 248.181065] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [ 248.186196] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [ 248.188736] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> [ 248.192230] CPU: 10 PID: 77 Comm: kworker/u26:2 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S OE 5.11.0-rc3 #2
> [ 248.201614] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X10DRi-LN4+, BIOS 3.1 06/08/2018
> [ 248.209258] Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> [ 248.214571] RIP: 0010:pm80xx_chip_sata_req+0x7f/0x5e0 [pm80xx]
> [ 248.220413] Code: c1 7c c1 e9 03 4d 8b ac 24 80 01 00 00 48 c7 44 24 14 00 00 00 00 89 04 24 31 c0 48 c7 84 24 88 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f3 48 ab <48> 8b ba 10 01 00 00 e8 35 35 c6 ef c1 e8 10 89 44 24 04 0f b6 43
> [ 248.239157] RSP: 0018:ffffb98d834979f0 EFLAGS: 00010046
> [ 248.244384] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9523c321c000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 248.251516] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff952450720048 RDI: ffffb98d83497a80
> [ 248.258641] RBP: ffff9523c7420000 R08: 0000000000000100 R09: 0000000000000001
> [ 248.265764] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff9523c9e40000 R12: ffff9523ca1c3600
> [ 248.272887] R13: ffff9523c9e40000 R14: ffffb98d83497a04 R15: ffff952450720048
> [ 248.280013] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9527afd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 248.288090] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 248.293826] CR2: 0000000000000110 CR3: 000000029ac10001 CR4: 00000000001706e0
> [ 248.300952] Call Trace:
I think that the problem here is that ata_queued_cmd->scmd is NULL for
the ata internal command.
Please try this fix:
---->8-----
@@ -4451,7 +4451,7 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct
pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = qc->scsicmd;
u32 tag = ccb->ccb_tag;
int ret;
- u32 q_index, blk_tag;
+ u32 q_index = 0, blk_tag;
struct sata_start_req sata_cmd;
u32 hdr_tag, ncg_tag = 0;
u64 phys_addr, start_addr, end_addr;
@@ -4463,8 +4463,10 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct
pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
u32 opc = OPC_INB_SATA_HOST_OPSTART;
memset(&sata_cmd, 0, sizeof(sata_cmd));
- blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
- q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
+ if (scmd) {
+ blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
+ q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
+ }
circularQ = &pm8001_ha->inbnd_q_tbl[q_index];
----8<-----
You may need similar for other dispatch paths also - like smp - but I
don't think that you will.
BTW, do you know if there is actually a limitation on the HW that queue
#0 is used for all "internal" IO (mpi), like phy control operation? Jack?
Thanks,
John
> [ 248.303402] pm8001_task_exec.isra.9+0x2a4/0x460 [pm80xx]
> [ 248.308805] sas_ata_qc_issue+0x187/0x220 [libsas]
> [ 248.313607] ata_qc_issue+0x107/0x1e0 [libata]
> [ 248.318069] ata_exec_internal_sg+0x2c8/0x580 [libata]
> [ 248.323217] ata_exec_internal+0x5f/0x90 [libata]
> [ 248.327931] ata_dev_read_id+0x306/0x480 [libata]
> [ 248.332647] ata_eh_recover+0x7ea/0x12a0 [libata]
> [ 248.337369] ? vprintk_emit+0x114/0x220
> [ 248.341208] ? sas_ata_sched_eh+0x60/0x60 [libsas]
> [ 248.346002] ? sas_ata_prereset+0x50/0x50 [libsas]
> [ 248.350795] ? printk+0x58/0x6f
> [ 248.353941] ? sas_ata_sched_eh+0x60/0x60 [libsas]
> [ 248.358733] ? sas_ata_prereset+0x50/0x50 [libsas]
> [ 248.363525] ata_do_eh+0x40/0xb0 [libata]
> [ 248.367556] ata_scsi_port_error_handler+0x354/0x770 [libata]
> [ 248.373318] async_sas_ata_eh+0x44/0x7b [libsas]
> [ 248.377938] async_run_entry_fn+0x39/0x160
> [ 248.382040] process_one_work+0x1cb/0x360
> [ 248.386050] worker_thread+0x30/0x370
> [ 248.389706] ? processe_work+0x360/0x360
> [ 248.393884] kthread+0x116/0x130
> [ 248.397116] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
> [ 248.400773] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> [ 248.404355] Modules linked in: pm80xx(OE) libsas scsi_transport_sas xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 nft_compat nft_counter nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc rfkill sunrpc vfat fat intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common sb_edac x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm irqbypass joydev crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel ipmi_ssif iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support mei_me rapl i2c_i801 intel_cstate mei acpi_ipmi lpc_ich intel_uncore pcspkr ipmi_si i2c_smbus ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter acpi_pad ioatdma ip_tables xfs libcrc32c sr_mod sd_mod cdrom t10_pi sg ast drm_vram_helper drm_kms_helper syscopyarea igb sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm_ttm_helper ttm ahci libahci dca drm crc32c_intel libata i2c_algo_bit wmi dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod fuse
> [ 248.483431] CR2: 0000000000000110
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.11.0-rc3 (root@...alhost.localdomain) (gcc (GCC) 8.3.1 20191121 (Red Hat 8.3.1-5), GNU ld version 2.30-79.el8) #2 SMP Mon Jan 25 23:56:12 IST 2021
> [ 0.000000] Command line: elfcorehr=0x45000000 BOOT_IMAGE=(hd14,gpt2)/vmlinuz-5.11.0-rc3 ro resume=/dev/mapper/rhel-swap rhgb console=ttyS1,115200 loglevel=7 irqpoll nr_cpus=1 reset_devices cgroup_disable=memory mce=off numa=off udev.children-max=2 panic=10 rootflags=nofail acpi_no_memhotplug transparent_hugepage=never nokaslr novmcoredd hest_disable disable_cpu_apicid=0
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 4:47 PM
>> To: jejb@...ux.ibm.com; martin.petersen@...cle.com;
>> akshatzen@...gle.com; Viswas G - I30667 <Viswas.G@...rochip.com>;
>> Ruksar Devadi - I52327 <Ruksar.devadi@...rochip.com>;
>> radha@...gle.com; bjashnani@...gle.com; vishakhavc@...gle.com;
>> jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com; Ashokkumar N - X53535
>> <Ashokkumar.N@...rochip.com>
>> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; hare@...e.de;
>> kashyap.desai@...adcom.com; ming.lei@...hat.com; John Garry
>> <john.garry@...wei.com>
>> Subject: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx hw
>>
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
>> content is safe
>>
>> In commit 05c6c029a44d ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase number of supported
>> queues"), support for 80xx chip was improved by enabling multiple HW
>> queues.
>>
>> In this, like other SCSI MQ HBA drivers, the HW queues were not exposed to
>> upper layer, and instead the driver managed the queues internally.
>>
>> However, this management duplicates blk-mq code. In addition, the HW
>> queue management is sub-optimal for a system where the number of CPUs
>> exceeds the HW queues - this is because queues are selected in a round-
>> robin fashion, when it would be better to make adjacent CPUs submit on the
>> same queue. And finally, the affinity of the completion queue interrupts is
>> not set to mirror the cpu<->HQ queue mapping, which is suboptimal.
>>
>> As such, for when MSIX is supported, expose HW queues to upper layer. Flag
>> PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY is set for allocating the MSIX vectors to automatically
>> assign affinity for the completion queue interrupts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>>
>> ---
>> I sent as an RFC/RFT as I have no HW to test. In addition, since HW queue
>> #0 is used always for internal commands (like in send_task_abort()), if all
>> CPUs associated with HW queue #0 are offlined, the interrupt for that queue
>> will be shutdown, and no CPUs would be available to service any internal
>> commands completion. To solve that, we need [0] merged first and switch
>> over to use the new API. But we can still test performance in the meantime.
>>
>> I assume someone else is making the change to use the request tag for IO
>> tag management.
>>
>> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/47ba045e-a490-198b-1744-
>> 529f97192d3b@...e.de/
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> index ee2de177d0d0..73479803a23e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>> @@ -81,6 +81,15 @@ LIST_HEAD(hba_list);
>>
>> struct workqueue_struct *pm8001_wq;
>>
>> +static int pm8001_map_queues(struct Scsi_Host *shost) {
>> + struct sas_ha_struct *sha = SHOST_TO_SAS_HA(shost);
>> + struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha = sha->lldd_ha;
>> + struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap =
>> +&shost->tag_set.map[HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT];
>> +
>> + return blk_mq_pci_map_queues(qmap, pm8001_ha->pdev, 0); }
>> +
>> /*
>> * The main structure which LLDD must register for scsi core.
>> */
>> @@ -106,6 +115,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template pm8001_sht = {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> .compat_ioctl = sas_ioctl,
>> #endif
>> + .map_queues = pm8001_map_queues,
>> .shost_attrs = pm8001_host_attrs,
>> .track_queue_depth = 1,
>> };
>> @@ -923,9 +933,8 @@ static int pm8001_configure_phy_settings(struct
>> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha) static u32 pm8001_setup_msix(struct
>> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha) {
>> u32 number_of_intr;
>> - int rc, cpu_online_count;
>> + int rc;
>> unsigned int allocated_irq_vectors;
>> -
>> /* SPCv controllers supports 64 msi-x */
>> if (pm8001_ha->chip_id == chip_8001) {
>> number_of_intr = 1;
>> @@ -933,16 +942,15 @@ static u32 pm8001_setup_msix(struct
>> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
>> number_of_intr = PM8001_MAX_MSIX_VEC;
>> }
>>
>> - cpu_online_count = num_online_cpus();
>> - number_of_intr = min_t(int, cpu_online_count, number_of_intr);
>> - rc = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pm8001_ha->pdev, number_of_intr,
>> - number_of_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
>> + /* Use default affinity descriptor, which spreads *all* vectors */
>> + rc = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pm8001_ha->pdev, 1,
>> + number_of_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX |
>> + PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY);
>> allocated_irq_vectors = rc;
>> if (rc < 0)
>> return rc;
>>
>> /* Assigns the number of interrupts */
>> - number_of_intr = min_t(int, allocated_irq_vectors, number_of_intr);
>> + number_of_intr = allocated_irq_vectors;
>> pm8001_ha->number_of_intr = number_of_intr;
>>
>> /* Maximum queue number updating in HBA structure */ @@ -1113,6
>> +1121,16 @@ static int pm8001_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> if (rc)
>> goto err_out_enable;
>>
>> + if (pm8001_ha->number_of_intr > 1) {
>> + shost->nr_hw_queues = pm8001_ha->number_of_intr;
>> + /*
>> + * For now, ensure we're not sent too many commands by setting
>> + * host_tagset. This is also required if we start using request
>> + * tag.
>> + */
>> + shost->host_tagset = 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> rc = scsi_add_host(shost, &pdev->dev);
>> if (rc)
>> goto err_out_ha_free;
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
>> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
>> index f2c8cbad3853..74bc6fed693e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
>> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@
>> #include <scsi/scsi_tcq.h>
>> #include <scsi/sas_ata.h>
>> #include <linux/atomic.h>
>> +#include <linux/blk-mq.h>
>> +#include <linux/blk-mq-pci.h>
>> #include "pm8001_defs.h"
>>
>> #define DRV_NAME "pm80xx"
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
>> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
>> index 6772b0924dac..31d65ce91e7d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
>> @@ -4299,12 +4299,13 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_ssp_io_req(struct
>> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>> struct domain_device *dev = task->dev;
>> struct pm8001_device *pm8001_dev = dev->lldd_dev;
>> struct ssp_ini_io_start_req ssp_cmd;
>> + struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = task->uldd_task;
>> u32 tag = ccb->ccb_tag;
>> int ret;
>> u64 phys_addr, start_addr, end_addr;
>> u32 end_addr_high, end_addr_low;
>> struct inbound_queue_table *circularQ;
>> - u32 q_index, cpu_id;
>> + u32 blk_tag, q_index;
>> u32 opc = OPC_INB_SSPINIIOSTART;
>> memset(&ssp_cmd, 0, sizeof(ssp_cmd));
>> memcpy(ssp_cmd.ssp_iu.lun, task->ssp_task.LUN, 8); @@ -4323,8
>> +4324,8 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_ssp_io_req(struct pm8001_hba_info
>> *pm8001_ha,
>> ssp_cmd.ssp_iu.efb_prio_attr |= (task->ssp_task.task_attr & 7);
>> memcpy(ssp_cmd.ssp_iu.cdb, task->ssp_task.cmd->cmnd,
>> task->ssp_task.cmd->cmd_len);
>> - cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
>> - q_index = (u32) (cpu_id) % (pm8001_ha->max_q_num);
>> + blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
>> + q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
>> circularQ = &pm8001_ha->inbnd_q_tbl[q_index];
>>
>> /* Check if encryption is set */ @@ -4446,9 +4447,11 @@ static int
>> pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>> struct sas_task *task = ccb->task;
>> struct domain_device *dev = task->dev;
>> struct pm8001_device *pm8001_ha_dev = dev->lldd_dev;
>> + struct ata_queued_cmd *qc = task->uldd_task;
>> + struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = qc->scsicmd;
>> u32 tag = ccb->ccb_tag;
>> int ret;
>> - u32 q_index, cpu_id;
>> + u32 q_index, blk_tag;
>> struct sata_start_req sata_cmd;
>> u32 hdr_tag, ncg_tag = 0;
>> u64 phys_addr, start_addr, end_addr; @@ -4459,8 +4462,9 @@ static int
>> pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>> unsigned long flags;
>> u32 opc = OPC_INB_SATA_HOST_OPSTART;
>> memset(&sata_cmd, 0, sizeof(sata_cmd));
>> - cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
>> - q_index = (u32) (cpu_id) % (pm8001_ha->max_q_num);
>> +
>> + blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
>
> Here the scsi command is NULL.
>
> if(scmd) {
> blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
> q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
> } else {
> q_index = 0;
> }
>
> With this change, we have started our testing. We will update you the result soon.
>
>> + q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
>> circularQ = &pm8001_ha->inbnd_q_tbl[q_index];
>>
>> if (task->data_dir == DMA_NONE) {
>> --
>> 2.26.2
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists