[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4162801.1612185801@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:23:21 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patrick@...terwijk.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] x509: Detect sm2 keys by their parameters OID
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> Detect whether a key is an sm2 type of key by its OID in the parameters
> array rather than assuming that everything under OID_id_ecPublicKey
> is sm2, which is not the case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> Cc: keyrings@...r.kernel.org
I presume these cc's are intentionally not on the first patch or the cover (if
there is one)?
Do you have a branch you want me to pull or did you want me to take just
patches 2-4?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists