linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] opp: Don't ignore clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:05:06 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] opp: Don't ignore clk_get() errors other than -ENOENT

On 01-02-21, 22:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Thanks, looks okay.
> 
> Although, I think the previous variant of coding style was a bit more appropriate, i.e. like this:
> 
> dev_err_probe(dev, "%s: Couldn't find clock: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> 
> return ERR_PTR(ret);

Okay will move to that.

-- 
viresh