[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <161307117419.1254594.16016042022739644084@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:19:34 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] opp: Don't ignore clk_get() errors other than -ENOENT
Quoting Viresh Kumar (2021-01-31 20:22:58)
> Not all devices that need to use OPP core need to have clocks, a missing
> clock is fine in which case -ENOENT shall be returned by clk_get().
>
> Anything else is an error and must be handled properly.
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
> V2:
> - s/ENODEV/ENOENT
> - Use dev_err_probe()
>
> Stephen, is the understanding correct that -ENOENT is the only error
> returned for missing clocks ?
Yeah pretty much. See clk_get_optional().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists