lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28583efc-1a3a-a863-fb68-cfe3afa9d68a@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 08:29:57 +0800
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Yian Chen <yian.chen@...el.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/vt-d: Parse SATC reporting structure

Hi Ashok,

On 2/3/21 12:41 AM, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 12:40:56PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> From: Yian Chen <yian.chen@...el.com>
>>
>> Software should parse every SATC table and all devices in the tables
>> reported by the BIOS and keep the information in kernel list for further
>> SATC policy deployment.
>>
> The last part seems bit vague? Are you trying to imply,
> 
> if kernel is booted with noats for instance, a device listed in SATC table
> as "requires ATS" will fail to load?
> 
> Otherwise its not clear what the policy enforcement means.
> 

Yes. This is a bit vague. The ATS policy is out of the purpose of this
patch. It only parses the table and keep the device list for further
reference.

Best regards,
baolu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ