[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7650bd0f-7084-fd2c-d197-239dffdd7923@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 08:26:50 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Yian Chen <yian.chen@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/vt-d: Parse SATC reporting structure
Hi Joerg,
On 2/2/21 9:53 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 12:40:56PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> + case ACPI_DMAR_TYPE_SATC:
>> + satc = container_of(header, struct acpi_dmar_satc, header);
>> + pr_info("SATC flags: 0x%x\n", satc->flags);
>> + break;
>
> Did the pr_info() slip through or is there a real purpose for having
> this information in the kernel log?
>
Here is just the easiest way for users to know SATC: system has SATC?
ATS is required?
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists