linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel: debug: fix typo issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210203193609.00007678@163.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:36:09 +0800
From:   wengjianfeng <samirweng1979@....com>
To:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc:     jason.wessel@...driver.com, dianders@...omium.org,
        kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: debug: fix typo issue

On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:23:59 +0000
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:10:34PM +0800, samirweng1979 wrote:
> > From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
> > 
> > change 'regster' to 'register'.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
> 
> It looks like the Subject line might not be correct for this patch?
> 
> Is it really the first time this patch has been circulated or should
> it have been tagged RESEND or v2?
> 
> 
> Daniel.
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  kernel/debug/gdbstub.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> > index a77df59..e149a0a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> > +++ b/kernel/debug/gdbstub.c
> > @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static char *gdb_hex_reg_helper(int regnum,
> > char *out) dbg_reg_def[i].size);
> >  }
> >  
> > -/* Handle the 'p' individual regster get */
> > +/* Handle the 'p' individual register get */
> >  static void gdb_cmd_reg_get(struct kgdb_state *ks)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long regnum;
> > @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static void gdb_cmd_reg_get(struct kgdb_state
> > *ks) gdb_hex_reg_helper(regnum, remcom_out_buffer);
> >  }
> >  
> > -/* Handle the 'P' individual regster set */
> > +/* Handle the 'P' individual register set */
> >  static void gdb_cmd_reg_set(struct kgdb_state *ks)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long regnum;
> > -- 
> > 1.9.1
> > 
> > 


Hi Daniel,
   The patch was first sent on January 25, but nobody relply me, so I
   just resend the patch, and the patch is the same as last time,does I
   need add RESEND tag? thanks.