linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kernel: debug: fix typo issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210203115555.amlmxszvfidjic46@maple.lan>
Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:55:55 +0000
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To:     wengjianfeng <samirweng1979@....com>
Cc:     jason.wessel@...driver.com, dianders@...omium.org,
        kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: debug: fix typo issue

On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 07:36:09PM +0800, wengjianfeng wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 11:23:59 +0000
> Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:10:34PM +0800, samirweng1979 wrote:
> > > From: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
> > > 
> > > change 'regster' to 'register'.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>
> > 
> > It looks like the Subject line might not be correct for this patch?
> > 
> > Is it really the first time this patch has been circulated or should
> > it have been tagged RESEND or v2?
>
>    The patch was first sent on January 25, but nobody relply me, so I
>    just resend the patch, and the patch is the same as last time,does I
>    need add RESEND tag? thanks.
 
Yes. When resending a patch adding a RESEND is a useful courtesy to let
the maintainer know why they have received two copies of the same patch
(and to make clear that the content is the same).


Daniel.