[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGZ6i=3ToBe51NkBzgvoOmEuJoq+LmLhhk+FGb=vptw5+Xh+gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 23:42:28 +0800
From: Kyle Tso <kyletso@...gle.com>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
Badhri Jagan Sridharan <badhri@...gle.com>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] usb: typec: Manage SVDM version
Thank you Heikki and Guenter for these valuable reviews.
I will update it in the next version.
thanks,
Kyle
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 11:04 PM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 05:01:26PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 06:51:43AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > Thinking about it, would it make make sense to define the functions as
> > > static inline ?
> >
> > I (and I believe Guenter too)
>
> s/I believe Guenter too/I thought you too/
>
> > want to keep these structures protected
> > for now. If the API starts to get too bloated, then I guess I have to
> > reconsider that. But I don't think we are there yet.
> >
> > I have been thinking about moving the USB PD negotiation details to a
> > separate structure that could be more accessible for everybody. That
> > should allow me continue to protect my precious structures. But I have
> > not yet put much though into that.
>
>
> --
> heikki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists