| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 12:17:45 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm-current tree
Hi all,
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 20:03:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allnoconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/page.h:76,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:12,
> from include/linux/thread_info.h:56,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:7,
> from include/linux/preempt.h:78,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:51,
> from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
> from include/linux/gfp.h:6,
> from include/linux/slab.h:15,
> from include/linux/crypto.h:20,
> from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9:
> include/linux/mm.h: In function 'is_pinnable_page':
> include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:64:14: error: implicit declaration of function 'page_to_section'; did you mean 'present_section'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 64 | int __sec = page_to_section(__pg); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:81:21: note: in expansion of macro '__page_to_pfn'
> 81 | #define page_to_pfn __page_to_pfn
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/mm.h:1134:15: note: in expansion of macro 'page_to_pfn'
> 1134 | is_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(page));
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from include/linux/kallsyms.h:12,
> from include/linux/bpf.h:21,
> from include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h:5,
> from include/linux/cgroup-defs.h:22,
> from include/linux/cgroup.h:28,
> from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13,
> from include/linux/swap.h:9,
> from include/linux/suspend.h:5,
> from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:13:
> include/linux/mm.h: At top level:
> include/linux/mm.h:1505:29: error: conflicting types for 'page_to_section'
> 1505 | static inline unsigned long page_to_section(const struct page *page)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/page.h:76,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:12,
> from include/linux/thread_info.h:56,
> from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:7,
> from include/linux/preempt.h:78,
> from include/linux/spinlock.h:51,
> from include/linux/mmzone.h:8,
> from include/linux/gfp.h:6,
> from include/linux/slab.h:15,
> from include/linux/crypto.h:20,
> from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:9:
> include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:64:14: note: previous implicit declaration of 'page_to_section' was here
> 64 | int __sec = page_to_section(__pg); \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/asm-generic/memory_model.h:81:21: note: in expansion of macro '__page_to_pfn'
> 81 | #define page_to_pfn __page_to_pfn
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/mm.h:1134:15: note: in expansion of macro 'page_to_pfn'
> 1134 | is_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(page));
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>
> This build has CONFIG_SPARSEMEM set and CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP not set.
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 983cb10d3f90 ("mm/gup: do not migrate zero page")
>
> I have applied the following patch for today:
>
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:49:00 +1100
> Subject: [PATCH] make is_pinnable_page a macro
>
> As it is currently defined before page_to_section() which it needs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 58f250cabea6..a608feb0d42e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1128,11 +1128,9 @@ static inline bool is_zone_movable_page(const struct page *page)
> }
>
> /* MIGRATE_CMA and ZONE_MOVABLE do not allow pin pages */
> -static inline bool is_pinnable_page(struct page *page)
> -{
> - return !(is_zone_movable_page(page) || is_migrate_cma_page(page)) ||
> - is_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(page));
> -}
> +#define is_pinnable_page(page) \
> + (!(is_zone_movable_page(page) || is_migrate_cma_page(page)) || \
> + is_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(page)))
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEV_PAGEMAP_OPS
> void free_devmap_managed_page(struct page *page);
> --
> 2.29.2
OK, so today I will add the following to linux-next as it is still
needed.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 12:05:57 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] make is_pinnable_page a macro
As it is currently defined before page_to_section() which it needs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 13 ++++---------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index baa3d3a9b655..8b1f889c6715 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1123,16 +1123,11 @@ static inline bool is_zone_movable_page(const struct page *page)
#ifdef CONFIG_MIGRATION
/* MIGRATE_CMA and ZONE_MOVABLE do not allow pin pages */
-static inline bool is_pinnable_page(struct page *page)
-{
- return !(is_zone_movable_page(page) || is_migrate_cma_page(page)) ||
- is_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(page));
-}
+#define is_pinnable_page(page) \
+ (!(is_zone_movable_page(page) || is_migrate_cma_page(page)) || \
+ is_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(page)))
#else
-static inline bool is_pinnable_page(struct page *page)
-{
- return true;
-}
+#define is_pinnable_page(page) true
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_PAGEMAP_OPS
--
2.30.0
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists