| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkptDuAckKB_GCY8ct2U_6FjLHJt7FKhU1qfg7G-RmbBSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:40:55 -0800
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH 08/11] mm: vmscan: use per memcg nr_deferred of shrinker
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 6:42 AM Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
>
> On 04.02.2021 20:23, Yang Shi wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 12:42 AM Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 03.02.2021 20:20, Yang Shi wrote:
> >>> Use per memcg's nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers. The shrinker's nr_deferred
> >>> will be used in the following cases:
> >>> 1. Non memcg aware shrinkers
> >>> 2. !CONFIG_MEMCG
> >>> 3. memcg is disabled by boot parameter
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> mm/vmscan.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >>> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> >>> index d9126f12890f..545422d2aeec 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> >>> @@ -190,6 +190,13 @@ static int shrinker_nr_max;
> >>> #define NR_MAX_TO_SHR_MAP_SIZE(nr_max) \
> >>> (DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_max, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long))
> >>>
> >>> +static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_protected(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> >>> + int nid)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
> >>> + lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
> >>> +}
> >>
> >> Thanks for the helper. Why not to introduce and become to use it in old places
> >> in a separate patch?
> >
> > What do you mean about "old places"? Where was it introduced in v5 (in
> > patch #10)?
>
> I mean existing places touched by this patch, which became to use the new helper
> in this patch: free_shrinker_info(), expand_one_shrinker_info(), shrink_slab_memcg().
Aha, I see. So, you mean add the helper before in a separate patch.
Right after patch #5 (which rename shrinker_map to shrinker_info)
should be a good place.
>
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> static void free_shrinker_info_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
> >>> {
> >>> kvfree(container_of(head, struct shrinker_info, rcu));
> >>> @@ -204,8 +211,7 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> >>> int size = m_size + d_size;
> >>>
> >>> for_each_node(nid) {
> >>> - old = rcu_dereference_protected(
> >>> - mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid)->shrinker_info, true);
> >>> + old = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
> >>> /* Not yet online memcg */
> >>> if (!old)
> >>> return 0;
> >>> @@ -239,7 +245,7 @@ void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >>>
> >>> for_each_node(nid) {
> >>> pn = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid);
> >>> - info = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info, true);
> >>> + info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
> >>> kvfree(info);
> >>> rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, NULL);
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -358,6 +364,25 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> >>> up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +
> >>> +static long count_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
> >>> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct shrinker_info *info;
> >>> +
> >>> + info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
> >>> + return atomic_long_xchg(&info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id], 0);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static long set_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
> >>> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct shrinker_info *info;
> >>> +
> >>> + info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
> >>> + return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id]);
> >>> +}
> >>
> >> Names confuse me a little bit. What about xchg_nr_deferred_memcg() and add_nr_deferred_memcg()?
> >
> > add_nr_deferred_memcg() sounds more self-explained to me.
> >
> >>
> >>> static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> >>> {
> >>> return sc->target_mem_cgroup;
> >>> @@ -396,6 +421,18 @@ static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
> >>> {
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +static long count_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
> >>> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static long set_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
> >>> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> static bool cgroup_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
> >>> {
> >>> return false;
> >>> @@ -407,6 +444,39 @@ static bool writeback_throttling_sane(struct scan_control *sc)
> >>> }
> >>> #endif
> >>>
> >>> +static long count_nr_deferred(struct shrinker *shrinker,
> >>> + struct shrink_control *sc)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int nid = sc->nid;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
> >>> + nid = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (sc->memcg &&
> >>> + (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
> >>> + return count_nr_deferred_memcg(nid, shrinker,
> >>> + sc->memcg);
> >>> +
> >>> + return atomic_long_xchg(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid], 0);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +
> >>> +static long set_nr_deferred(long nr, struct shrinker *shrinker,
> >>> + struct shrink_control *sc)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int nid = sc->nid;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
> >>> + nid = 0;
> >>> +
> >>> + if (sc->memcg &&
> >>> + (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE))
> >>> + return set_nr_deferred_memcg(nr, nid, shrinker,
> >>> + sc->memcg);
> >>> +
> >>> + return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> /*
> >>> * This misses isolated pages which are not accounted for to save counters.
> >>> * As the data only determines if reclaim or compaction continues, it is
> >>> @@ -539,14 +609,10 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
> >>> long freeable;
> >>> long nr;
> >>> long new_nr;
> >>> - int nid = shrinkctl->nid;
> >>> long batch_size = shrinker->batch ? shrinker->batch
> >>> : SHRINK_BATCH;
> >>> long scanned = 0, next_deferred;
> >>>
> >>> - if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
> >>> - nid = 0;
> >>> -
> >>> freeable = shrinker->count_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl);
> >>> if (freeable == 0 || freeable == SHRINK_EMPTY)
> >>> return freeable;
> >>> @@ -556,7 +622,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
> >>> * and zero it so that other concurrent shrinker invocations
> >>> * don't also do this scanning work.
> >>> */
> >>> - nr = atomic_long_xchg(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid], 0);
> >>> + nr = count_nr_deferred(shrinker, shrinkctl);
> >>>
> >>> total_scan = nr;
> >>> if (shrinker->seeks) {
> >>> @@ -647,14 +713,9 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
> >>> next_deferred = 0;
> >>> /*
> >>> * move the unused scan count back into the shrinker in a
> >>> - * manner that handles concurrent updates. If we exhausted the
> >>> - * scan, there is no need to do an update.
> >>> + * manner that handles concurrent updates.
> >>> */
> >>> - if (next_deferred > 0)
> >>> - new_nr = atomic_long_add_return(next_deferred,
> >>> - &shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]);
> >>> - else
> >>> - new_nr = atomic_long_read(&shrinker->nr_deferred[nid]);
> >>> + new_nr = set_nr_deferred(next_deferred, shrinker, shrinkctl);
> >>>
> >>> trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, shrinkctl->nid, freed, nr, new_nr, total_scan);
> >>> return freed;
> >>> @@ -674,8 +735,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> >>> if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
> >>> return 0;
> >>>
> >>> - info = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
> >>> - true);
> >>> + info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
> >>> if (unlikely(!info))
> >>> goto unlock;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists