[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210205083416.GR2789116@dell>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 08:34:16 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] ASoC: Intel: Add DMI quirk table to
soc_intel_is_byt_cr()
On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:40:58PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:04:56PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > > > This set has all the Acks we need to proceed. What's blocking?
>
> > > There's the subsystem maintainer...
>
> > I assume that was a question and you meant "where's"?
>
> > Pierre is listed as the Maintainer.
>
> I'm fairly sure you can see what I meant here and why there might be a
> concern.
So that should be a Reviewed-by and not an Acked-by then. That's fine.
What do you want to happen with this set then?
You want it broken up?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists