linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] ASoC: Intel: Add DMI quirk table to soc_intel_is_byt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210205211101.GL4720@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:11:01 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] ASoC: Intel: Add DMI quirk table to
 soc_intel_is_byt_cr()

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:34:16AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:40:58PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:04:56PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

> > > > > This set has all the Acks we need to proceed.  What's blocking?

> > > > There's the subsystem maintainer...

> > > I assume that was a question and you meant "where's"?

> > > Pierre is listed as the Maintainer.

> > I'm fairly sure you can see what I meant here and why there might be a
> > concern.

> So that should be a Reviewed-by and not an Acked-by then.  That's fine.

No, it's that there's plenty of drivers like this that are listed in
MAINTAINERS but still generally go through subsystem trees - this is
also true of for quite a few MFD drivers, you tend to get a bit annoyed
(quite reasonably) whenever I mistakenly pull MFD changes for them into
one of my trees without syncing with you.

> What do you want to happen with this set then?

> You want it broken up?

I guess, or at least a pull request so it's in my tree and I'll notice
any coverage issues.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)