linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] ASoC: Intel: Add DMI quirk table to soc_intel_is_byt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210208083350.GA4766@dell>
Date:   Mon, 8 Feb 2021 08:33:50 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
        patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] ASoC: Intel: Add DMI quirk table to
 soc_intel_is_byt_cr()

On Fri, 05 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:34:16AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:40:58PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:04:56PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > > > > > This set has all the Acks we need to proceed.  What's blocking?
> 
> > > > > There's the subsystem maintainer...
> 
> > > > I assume that was a question and you meant "where's"?
> 
> > > > Pierre is listed as the Maintainer.
> 
> > > I'm fairly sure you can see what I meant here and why there might be a
> > > concern.
> 
> > So that should be a Reviewed-by and not an Acked-by then.  That's fine.
> 
> No, it's that there's plenty of drivers like this that are listed in
> MAINTAINERS but still generally go through subsystem trees - this is
> also true of for quite a few MFD drivers, you tend to get a bit annoyed
> (quite reasonably) whenever I mistakenly pull MFD changes for them into
> one of my trees without syncing with you.

Driver Maintainers in MFD don't sent Acks.

> > What do you want to happen with this set then?
> 
> > You want it broken up?
> 
> I guess, or at least a pull request so it's in my tree and I'll notice
> any coverage issues.

Okay, I'll process it.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog