[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YByVvsFL5/X/+kLc@chrisdown.name>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 00:47:58 +0000
From: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Userspace format enumeration support
Some improvements I noticed that I'll include when sending v2.
Chris Down writes:
>+static void remove_printk_fmt_sec(const struct module *mod)
>+{
>+ struct printk_fmt_sec *tmp = NULL, *ps = NULL;
>+ const char **fptr = NULL;
fptr can be scoped to list_for_each_entry_safe, I'll move it.
>+static int proc_pf_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
>+{
>+ const struct printk_fmt_sec *ps = NULL;
>+ const char **fptr = NULL;
Ditto for list_for_each_entry.
>+
>+ mutex_lock(&printk_fmts_mutex);
>+
>+ list_for_each_entry(ps, &printk_fmts_list, list) {
>+ const char *mod_name = ps_get_module_name(ps);
>+
>+ for (fptr = ps->start; fptr < ps->end; fptr++) {
>+ seq_puts(s, mod_name);
>+ seq_putc(s, ',');
>+ seq_puts(s, *fptr);
>+ seq_putc(s, '\0');
>+ }
>+ }
Not sure why I didn't just use seq_printf here. I'll do that.
I'll wait a few days for feedback then will send v2 either way. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists