[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210205114830.781-5-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 12:48:28 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
bristot@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joel@...lfernandes.org
Cc: qais.yousef@....com, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] sched/fair: reorder newidle_balance pulled_task test
Reorder the tests and skip prevent useless test when no load balance has
been performed.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c587af230010..935594cd5430 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10592,7 +10592,6 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
if (curr_cost > this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost)
this_rq->max_idle_balance_cost = curr_cost;
-out:
/*
* While browsing the domains, we released the rq lock, a task could
* have been enqueued in the meantime. Since we're not going idle,
@@ -10601,14 +10600,15 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
if (this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running && !pulled_task)
pulled_task = 1;
- /* Move the next balance forward */
- if (time_after(this_rq->next_balance, next_balance))
- this_rq->next_balance = next_balance;
-
/* Is there a task of a high priority class? */
if (this_rq->nr_running != this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running)
pulled_task = -1;
+out:
+ /* Move the next balance forward */
+ if (time_after(this_rq->next_balance, next_balance))
+ this_rq->next_balance = next_balance;
+
if (pulled_task)
this_rq->idle_stamp = 0;
else
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists