lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:15:01 +0000
From:   Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com" <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
        Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
        "Geethasowjanya Akula" <gakula@...vell.com>,
        Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@...vell.com>,
        Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link
 configuration

Hi Jakub,



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 12:21 AM
> To: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> davem@...emloft.net; willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com;
> andrew@...n.ch; Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>; Linu
> Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>; Geethasowjanya Akula
> <gakula@...vell.com>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@...vell.com>;
> Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [Patch v3 net-next 7/7] octeontx2-pf: ethtool physical link
> configuration
> 
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 17:37:41 +0000 Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> > > > +	req->args.speed = req_ks.base.speed;
> > > > +	/* firmware expects 1 for half duplex and 0 for full duplex
> > > > +	 * hence inverting
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	req->args.duplex = req_ks.base.duplex ^ 0x1;
> > > > +	req->args.an = req_ks.base.autoneg;
> > > > +	otx2_get_advertised_mode(&req_ks, &req->args.mode);
> > >
> > > But that only returns the first bit set. What does the device
> > > actually do? What if the user cleared a middle bit?
> > >
> > This is initial patch series to support advertised modes. Current
> > firmware design is such that It can handle only one advertised mode.
> > Due to this limitation we are always checking The first set bit in advertised
> modes and passing it to firmware.
> > Will add multi advertised mode support in near future.
> 
> Looking at patch 6 it seems like the get side already supports multiple modes,
> although the example output only lists supported no advertised.
> 
> Is the device actually doing IEEE autoneg or just configures the speed, lanes
> etc. according to the link mode selected?

Device supports IEEE autoneg mode. Agreed get_link_ksetting returns multiple modes .  
But set side  firmware code designed in such way that  it handles  single mode. Upon
Successful configuration firmware updates advertised modes to shared memory
 such that kernel will read and updates to ethtool.

Thanks,
Hariprasad k

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ