linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: socket: use BIT() for MSG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADxym3bCt9-gvfFc1cVxfibVzDAZXFO9Q9WrDKK_FUdD+6rLnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 7 Feb 2021 22:14:53 +0800
From:   Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: socket: use BIT() for MSG_*

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 7:52 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 6:32 AM <menglong8.dong@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>
> >
> > The bit mask for MSG_* seems a little confused here. Replace it
> > with BIT() to make it clear to understand.
>
> Now it's confusing which version maintainer should take (you forgot,
> it seems twice, to bump the patch version and mention the changes in
> the changelog).

Sorry, a 'BIT_MASK()' escaped in the first one, and I just thought that the
second one will override the first one, as long as I send it quick enough
before anyone see it:)

Thanks~
Menglong Dong