[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210208181313.GH4247@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:13:13 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
CC: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <liranl@...dia.com>,
<oren@...dia.com>, <tzahio@...dia.com>, <leonro@...dia.com>,
<yarong@...dia.com>, <aviadye@...dia.com>, <shahafs@...dia.com>,
<artemp@...dia.com>, <kwankhede@...dia.com>, <ACurrid@...dia.com>,
<gmataev@...dia.com>, <cjia@...dia.com>, <yishaih@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] vfio/pci: use x86 naming instead of igd
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:42:11AM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> > A real nvswitch function?
>
> What do you mean by this exactly? The cpu side of nvlink is "emulated pci
> devices", the gpu side is not in pci space at all, the nvidia driver manages
> it via the gpu's mmio or/and cfg space.
Some versions of the nvswitch chip have a PCI-E link too, that is what
I though this was all about when I first saw it.
So, it is really a special set of functions for NVIDIA GPU device
assignment only applicable to P9 systems, much like IGD is for Intel
on x86.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists