[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1612774677-56758-2-git-send-email-luojiaxing@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:57:56 +0800
From: Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
To: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
<ssantosh@...nel.org>, <khilman@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...neuler.org>
Subject: [PATCH for next v1 1/2] gpio: omap: Replace raw_spin_lock_irqsave with raw_spin_lock in omap_gpio_irq_handler()
There is no need to use API with _irqsave in omap_gpio_irq_handler(),
because it already be in a irq-disabled context.
Signed-off-by: Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 15 ++++++---------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
index 41952bb..dc8bbf4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
@@ -560,8 +560,6 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank)
u32 enabled, isr, edge;
unsigned int bit;
struct gpio_bank *bank = gpiobank;
- unsigned long wa_lock_flags;
- unsigned long lock_flags;
isr_reg = bank->base + bank->regs->irqstatus;
if (WARN_ON(!isr_reg))
@@ -572,7 +570,7 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank)
return IRQ_NONE;
while (1) {
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, lock_flags);
+ raw_spin_lock(&bank->lock);
enabled = omap_get_gpio_irqbank_mask(bank);
isr = readl_relaxed(isr_reg) & enabled;
@@ -586,7 +584,7 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank)
if (edge)
omap_clear_gpio_irqbank(bank, edge);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, lock_flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&bank->lock);
if (!isr)
break;
@@ -595,7 +593,7 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank)
bit = __ffs(isr);
isr &= ~(BIT(bit));
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, lock_flags);
+ raw_spin_lock(&bank->lock);
/*
* Some chips can't respond to both rising and falling
* at the same time. If this irq was requested with
@@ -606,15 +604,14 @@ static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank)
if (bank->toggle_mask & (BIT(bit)))
omap_toggle_gpio_edge_triggering(bank, bit);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, lock_flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&bank->lock);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags);
+ raw_spin_lock(&bank->wa_lock);
generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(bank->chip.irq.domain,
bit));
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->wa_lock,
- wa_lock_flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock(&bank->wa_lock);
}
}
exit:
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists