[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1612774677-56758-3-git-send-email-luojiaxing@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 16:57:57 +0800
From: Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
To: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
<ssantosh@...nel.org>, <khilman@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...neuler.org>
Subject: [PATCH for next v1 2/2] gpio: grgpio: Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in grgpio_irq_handler()
There is no need to use API with _irqsave in grgpio_irq_handler(),
because it already be in a irq-disabled context.
Signed-off-by: Luo Jiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c
index f954359..fa5aa31 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c
@@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ static irqreturn_t grgpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
{
struct grgpio_priv *priv = dev;
int ngpio = priv->gc.ngpio;
- unsigned long flags;
int i;
int match = 0;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock);
/*
* For each gpio line, call its interrupt handler if it its underlying
@@ -215,7 +214,7 @@ static irqreturn_t grgpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
}
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock);
if (!match)
dev_warn(priv->dev, "No gpio line matched irq %d\n", irq);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists