[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b8001bb-0bcd-3fea-e15c-2722e7243209@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:11:30 +0800
From: luojiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
To: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
<ssantosh@...nel.org>, <khilman@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...neuler.org>
Subject: Re: [Linuxarm] [PATCH for next v1 0/2] gpio: few clean up patches to
replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock
Sorry, my operation error causes a patch missing from this patch set. I
re-send the patch set. Please check the new one.
On 2021/2/8 16:56, Luo Jiaxing wrote:
> There is no need to use API with _irqsave in hard IRQ handler, So replace
> those with spin_lock.
>
> Luo Jiaxing (2):
> gpio: omap: Replace raw_spin_lock_irqsave with raw_spin_lock in
> omap_gpio_irq_handler()
> gpio: grgpio: Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in
> grgpio_irq_handler()
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c | 5 ++---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 15 ++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists