[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcpeYpsW6B85F0u=B+GToNh=1fYdRSMeQqE0vOtOdSi8A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:28:44 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: luojiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxarm@...neuler.org
Subject: Re: [Linuxarm] [PATCH for next v1 0/2] gpio: few clean up patches to
replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:11 AM luojiaxing <luojiaxing@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, my operation error causes a patch missing from this patch set. I
> re-send the patch set. Please check the new one.
What is the new one?! You have to give proper versioning and change
log for your series.
> On 2021/2/8 16:56, Luo Jiaxing wrote:
> > There is no need to use API with _irqsave in hard IRQ handler, So replace
> > those with spin_lock.
How do you know that another CPU in the system can't serve the
following interrupt from the hardware at the same time?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists