[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCEgcPv1TWe0DN50@pendragon.ideasonboard.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 13:28:48 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hyun Kwon <hyunk@...inx.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
sergei.shtylyov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] media: i2c: Add driver for RDACM21 camera module
Hi Hans,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 14/01/2021 18:04, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > The RDACM21 is a GMSL camera supporting 1280x1080 resolution images
> > developed by IMI based on an Omnivision OV10640 sensor, an Omnivision
> > OV490 ISP and a Maxim MAX9271 GMSL serializer.
> >
> > The driver uses the max9271 library module, to maximize code reuse with
> > other camera module drivers using the same serializer, such as rdacm20.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 12 +
> > drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig | 13 +
> > drivers/media/i2c/Makefile | 2 +
> > drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c | 623 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 650 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 14adf87d90c7..1822d73ed615 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -14967,6 +14967,18 @@ F: drivers/media/i2c/max9271.c
> > F: drivers/media/i2c/max9271.h
> > F: drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> >
> > +RDACM21 Camera Sensor
> > +M: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
> > +M: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
> > +M: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>
> > +M: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
> > +L: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
> > +S: Maintained
> > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/rdacm2x-gmsl.yaml
> > +F: drivers/media/i2c/max9271.c
> > +F: drivers/media/i2c/max9271.h
> > +F: drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c
> > +
> > RDC R-321X SoC
> > M: Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
> > S: Maintained
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig b/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> > index 2b9d81e4794a..d500edb8638b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> > @@ -1212,6 +1212,19 @@ config VIDEO_RDACM20
> > This camera should be used in conjunction with a GMSL
> > deserialiser such as the MAX9286.
> >
> > +config VIDEO_RDACM21
> > + tristate "IMI RDACM21 camera support"
> > + depends on I2C
> > + select V4L2_FWNODE
> > + select VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API
> > + select MEDIA_CONTROLLER
> > + help
> > + This driver supports the IMI RDACM21 GMSL camera, used in
> > + ADAS systems.
> > +
> > + This camera should be used in conjunction with a GMSL
> > + deserialiser such as the MAX9286.
> > +
> > config VIDEO_RJ54N1
> > tristate "Sharp RJ54N1CB0C sensor support"
> > depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> > index a3149dce21bb..85b1edc62508 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
> > @@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX355) += imx355.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_MAX9286) += max9286.o
> > rdacm20-camera_module-objs := rdacm20.o max9271.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_RDACM20) += rdacm20-camera_module.o
> > +rdacm21-camera_module-objs := rdacm21.o max9271.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_RDACM21) += rdacm21-camera_module.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ST_MIPID02) += st-mipid02.o
>
> This isn't right. The max9271 code exports various functions, but since it is
> included with *two* modules (rdacm20/1-camera_module.ko) it is exported twice.
>
> Since max9271 is not a self-contained driver it should not export symbols.
Shouldn't we instead make max9271 a stand-alone module ?
> Can you provide a patch fixing that?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists