[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0db4607-7e2b-ac88-c9d2-d1c5f75bbf86@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:34:55 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hyun Kwon <hyunk@...inx.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
sergei.shtylyov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] media: i2c: Add driver for RDACM21 camera module
On 08/02/2021 12:28, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 14/01/2021 18:04, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
>>> The RDACM21 is a GMSL camera supporting 1280x1080 resolution images
>>> developed by IMI based on an Omnivision OV10640 sensor, an Omnivision
>>> OV490 ISP and a Maxim MAX9271 GMSL serializer.
>>>
>>> The driver uses the max9271 library module, to maximize code reuse with
>>> other camera module drivers using the same serializer, such as rdacm20.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
>>> ---
>>> MAINTAINERS | 12 +
>>> drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig | 13 +
>>> drivers/media/i2c/Makefile | 2 +
>>> drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c | 623 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 650 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 14adf87d90c7..1822d73ed615 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -14967,6 +14967,18 @@ F: drivers/media/i2c/max9271.c
>>> F: drivers/media/i2c/max9271.h
>>> F: drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
>>>
>>> +RDACM21 Camera Sensor
>>> +M: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>
>>> +M: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
>>> +M: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>
>>> +M: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
>>> +L: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
>>> +S: Maintained
>>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/rdacm2x-gmsl.yaml
>>> +F: drivers/media/i2c/max9271.c
>>> +F: drivers/media/i2c/max9271.h
>>> +F: drivers/media/i2c/rdacm21.c
>>> +
>>> RDC R-321X SoC
>>> M: Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
>>> S: Maintained
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig b/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
>>> index 2b9d81e4794a..d500edb8638b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
>>> @@ -1212,6 +1212,19 @@ config VIDEO_RDACM20
>>> This camera should be used in conjunction with a GMSL
>>> deserialiser such as the MAX9286.
>>>
>>> +config VIDEO_RDACM21
>>> + tristate "IMI RDACM21 camera support"
>>> + depends on I2C
>>> + select V4L2_FWNODE
>>> + select VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API
>>> + select MEDIA_CONTROLLER
>>> + help
>>> + This driver supports the IMI RDACM21 GMSL camera, used in
>>> + ADAS systems.
>>> +
>>> + This camera should be used in conjunction with a GMSL
>>> + deserialiser such as the MAX9286.
>>> +
>>> config VIDEO_RJ54N1
>>> tristate "Sharp RJ54N1CB0C sensor support"
>>> depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
>>> index a3149dce21bb..85b1edc62508 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/Makefile
>>> @@ -124,6 +124,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX355) += imx355.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_MAX9286) += max9286.o
>>> rdacm20-camera_module-objs := rdacm20.o max9271.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_RDACM20) += rdacm20-camera_module.o
>>> +rdacm21-camera_module-objs := rdacm21.o max9271.o
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_RDACM21) += rdacm21-camera_module.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_ST_MIPID02) += st-mipid02.o
>>
>> This isn't right. The max9271 code exports various functions, but since it is
>> included with *two* modules (rdacm20/1-camera_module.ko) it is exported twice.
>>
>> Since max9271 is not a self-contained driver it should not export symbols.
>
> Shouldn't we instead make max9271 a stand-alone module ?
If that makes sense, then that's the alternative option. I don't know if it
can be used with anything else but rdacm20/21.
Either way, this needs to be fixed.
Regards,
Hans
>
>> Can you provide a patch fixing that?
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists