linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: cavium: Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpUSKJObVk49WSqDMkrcBp6s3bRpQR4kwntO0cFXue-Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Feb 2021 13:06:57 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>
Cc:     rric@...nel.org, Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxarm@...neuler.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: cavium: Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in
 hard IRQ

On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 08:09, Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> It is redundant to do irqsave and irqrestore in hardIRQ context, where
> it has been in a irq-disabled context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@...wei.com>

Applied for next, thanks!

Kind regards
Uffe


> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/cavium.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/cavium.c b/drivers/mmc/host/cavium.c
> index c5da3aa..4bb8f28 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/cavium.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/cavium.c
> @@ -436,12 +436,11 @@ irqreturn_t cvm_mmc_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  {
>         struct cvm_mmc_host *host = dev_id;
>         struct mmc_request *req;
> -       unsigned long flags = 0;
>         u64 emm_int, rsp_sts;
>         bool host_done;
>
>         if (host->need_irq_handler_lock)
> -               spin_lock_irqsave(&host->irq_handler_lock, flags);
> +               spin_lock(&host->irq_handler_lock);
>         else
>                 __acquire(&host->irq_handler_lock);
>
> @@ -504,7 +503,7 @@ irqreturn_t cvm_mmc_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
>                 host->release_bus(host);
>  out:
>         if (host->need_irq_handler_lock)
> -               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->irq_handler_lock, flags);
> +               spin_unlock(&host->irq_handler_lock);
>         else
>                 __release(&host->irq_handler_lock);
>         return IRQ_RETVAL(emm_int != 0);
> --
> 2.8.1
>