[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210209174023.GI4718@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:40:23 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Wei Zhang <wzam@...zon.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] mm: Introduce page_needs_cow_for_dma() for
deciding whether cow
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:02:27PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> We've got quite a few places (pte, pmd, pud) that explicitly checked against
> whether we should break the cow right now during fork(). It's easier to
> provide a helper, especially before we work the same thing on hugetlbfs.
>
> Since we'll reference is_cow_mapping() in mm.h, move it there too. Actually it
> suites mm.h more since internal.h is mm/ only, but mm.h is exported to the
> whole kernel. With that we should expect another patch to use is_cow_mapping()
> whenever we can across the kernel since we do use it quite a lot but it's
> always done with raw code against VM_* flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/huge_memory.c | 8 ++------
> mm/internal.h | 5 -----
> mm/memory.c | 8 +-------
> 4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists