lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 Feb 2021 13:54:24 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
        Kirill Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Wei Zhang <wzam@...zon.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] hugetlb: Do early cow when page pinned on src mm

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:02:29PM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> This is the last missing piece of the COW-during-fork effort when there're
> pinned pages found.  One can reference 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for
> pinned pages during fork() for ptes", 2020-09-27) for more information, since
> we do similar things here rather than pte this time, but just for hugetlb.
> 
> Note that after Jason's recent work on 57efa1fe5957 ("mm/gup: prevent gup_fast
> from racing with COW during fork", 2020-12-15) which is safer and easier to
> understand, we're safe now within the whole copy_page_range() against gup-fast,
> we don't need the wr-protect trick that proposed in 70e806e4e645 anymore.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
> ---
>  mm/hugetlb.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Didn't check every hugetlbfs detail, but looks reasonable

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ