linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210210162226.GA2246688@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:22:26 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        a.fatoum@...gutronix.de, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl,
        Ludovic Desroches <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com,
        Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:00:14AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:51:14AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Saravana,
> > 
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:57 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > Quoting Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com (2021-02-08 01:49:45)
> > > > > Do you plan to take this patch for v5.12?
> > > > > If fw_devlink will remain set to ON for v5.12, some of our boards will
> > > > > no longer boot without this patch.
> > > >
> > > > Is fw_devlink defaulted to on for v5.12?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > 
> > Have all issues been identified and understood?
> > Have all issues been fixed, reviewed, and committed?
> > Have all fixes entered linux-next?
> > Have all fixes been migrated from submaintainers to maintainers?

This can never be true for these types of per platform issues. There are 
folks that test linux-next Then there are ones that test rc1. And 
(unfortunately) so-on ending at testing only LTS releases.

> > We're already at v5.11-rc7.
> > Yes, we can get fixes into v5.12-rc7. Or v5.12-rc9...
> 
> Yeah, I'm leaning toward not making it the default for 5.12-rc1 because
> not everything seems to be working, let's see how the rest of the week
> goes...

I think there's some value waiting until after rc1 to turn off if just 
to find a few more issues.

Rob