linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWs-GqN-7tEPFfOeTQbvOH58T6WbBtVLsMNLT5qOHxsHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:10:41 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Ludovic Desroches <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl,
        Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
        a.fatoum@...gutronix.de, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks

Hi Saravana,

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:57 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:51 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:57 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > Quoting Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com (2021-02-08 01:49:45)
> > > > > Do you plan to take this patch for v5.12?
> > > > > If fw_devlink will remain set to ON for v5.12, some of our boards will
> > > > > no longer boot without this patch.
> > > >
> > > > Is fw_devlink defaulted to on for v5.12?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> >
> > Have all issues been identified and understood?
> > Have all issues been fixed, reviewed, and committed?
> > Have all fixes entered linux-next?
> > Have all fixes been migrated from submaintainers to maintainers?
>
> I'm hoping Tudor has reported and the fixes that have gone in so far
> addressed all his issues. Otherwise, they need to be reported so we
> can fix them.
>
> As of now, there's no pending fix that hasn't landed in maintainer
> trees. So that's good.

You're talking about driver core fixes.
What about driver fixes? E.g. pull request for (arm-)soc should be
srnt before -rc6.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds