linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:00:14 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Ludovic Desroches <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl,
        Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
        a.fatoum@...gutronix.de, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:51:14AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Saravana,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:57 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > Quoting Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com (2021-02-08 01:49:45)
> > > > Do you plan to take this patch for v5.12?
> > > > If fw_devlink will remain set to ON for v5.12, some of our boards will
> > > > no longer boot without this patch.
> > >
> > > Is fw_devlink defaulted to on for v5.12?
> >
> > Yes.
> 
> Have all issues been identified and understood?
> Have all issues been fixed, reviewed, and committed?
> Have all fixes entered linux-next?
> Have all fixes been migrated from submaintainers to maintainers?
> 
> We're already at v5.11-rc7.
> Yes, we can get fixes into v5.12-rc7. Or v5.12-rc9...

Yeah, I'm leaning toward not making it the default for 5.12-rc1 because
not everything seems to be working, let's see how the rest of the week
goes...

thanks,

greg k-h