linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:57:06 -0800
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Ludovic Desroches <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl,
        Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>,
        a.fatoum@...gutronix.de, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:51 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Saravana,
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:57 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > Quoting Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com (2021-02-08 01:49:45)
> > > > Do you plan to take this patch for v5.12?
> > > > If fw_devlink will remain set to ON for v5.12, some of our boards will
> > > > no longer boot without this patch.
> > >
> > > Is fw_devlink defaulted to on for v5.12?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Have all issues been identified and understood?
> Have all issues been fixed, reviewed, and committed?
> Have all fixes entered linux-next?
> Have all fixes been migrated from submaintainers to maintainers?

I'm hoping Tudor has reported and the fixes that have gone in so far
addressed all his issues. Otherwise, they need to be reported so we
can fix them.

As of now, there's no pending fix that hasn't landed in maintainer
trees. So that's good.

-Saravana

>
> We're already at v5.11-rc7.
> Yes, we can get fixes into v5.12-rc7. Or v5.12-rc9...
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds